|
Principal Components of
Secondary Mitral Regurgitation
Calculator
Principal Morphomic and Functional Components of Secondary
Mitral Regurgitation
Philipp E. Bartko, Gregor Heitzinger,
Georg Spinka, Noemi Pavo, Suriya Prausmüller, Stefan Kastl, Henrike Arfsten,
Timothy C. Tan, Catherine Gebhard, Julia Mascherbauer, Christian Hengstenberg;
Guido Strunk, Martin Hülsmann, Georg Goliasch
Background: Secondary mitral
regurgitation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
(sMR) typically results from distortion of the underlying cardiac
architecture. The morphological components which may account for the
clinical impact of sMR have not been systematically assessed or correlated
with clinical outcomes. Objectives: To identify the key
morphologic and functional features in sMR and their prognostic impact on
outcome.
Methods: Morphomic and functional
network profiling was performed on a cohort of stable heart failure patients
optimized on guideline based medical therapy. Principal component analysis
with varimax-rotation and subsequent cluster analysis was then used to
condense the morphomic and functional data fist into principal components
(factors) and second into homogenous clusters. Clusters and principal
components (factors) are tested for their correlations with clinical
outcomes.
Results: Morphomic and functional
data from 383 patients were profiled and subsequently condensed into
principal components (factors). Factor 1 describes high loadings of left
atrial morphological information, factor 2 high loadings of left ventricular
topology. Based on these factors, four homogenous clusters were derived. sMR
was most prominent in cluster 3 and 4 with the morphological difference
being left ventricular size (end diastolic volume 188ml (160-224) versus
315ml (264-408), P<0.001). Clusters were associated with mortality
(P<0.001), however, sMR remained independently associated with mortality
after adjusting for the clusters (adj.HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14–1.77; P<0.01).
The detrimental association of sMR with mortality was mainly driven by
cluster 3 (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.32-3.60; P=0.002), the “small LV cavity”
phenotype.
Conclusions: These results challenge
the current perceptions that sMR in heart failure with reduced ejection
fraction results exclusively from global or local LV remodeling and are
suggestive of a potential role of the left atrial. The association of sMR
with mortality cannot be purely attributed to cardiac morphology alone,
supporting other complementary key aspects of mitral valve closure
consistent with the force balance theory. The association of sMR with
mortality entirely driven by the small LV cavity phenotype refines the
prognostic impact of sMR at the interface of anatomic variability.
|
Results
Calculations are experimental, must be
re-checked and should not be used to guide patient care, nor should they
substitute for clinical judgment. The authors cannot and will not be held
legally, financially, or medically responsible for decisions made using this
calculator, equations, content, and algorithms. The calculater is for the
use of medical professionals only.
1. Component
represents the atrial component characterized by high loadings of LA length,
RA length, LA volume, RV end-diastolic diameter and LA diameter.
2. Component represents the left ventricular
component reflected by high loadings of LV end-diastolic volume, LV
end-systolic volume, LV end-diastolic diameter, LV end-diastolic apical
diameter, LV end-diastolic length.
Problem
Cluster:
Cluster alternative
|